Globalepolicy.org is a free to access global medical news service for the consumer, professional and researcher.
Our adviser: Drugs Infromation online


             
 

Background: A treatment algorithm and screening examination have been developed to guide patient management and prospectively determine potential for highly active individuals to succeed with nonoperative care after anterior cruciate ligament rupture.

Objective: To prospectively characterize and classify the entire population of highly active individuals over a 10-year period and provide final outcomes for individuals who elected nonoperative care.

Methods: Inclusion criteria included presentation within 7 months of the index injury and an International Knee Documentation Committee level I or II activity level before injury. Concomitant injury, unresolved impairments, and a screening examination were used as criteria to guide management and classify individuals as noncopers (poor potential) or potential copers (good potential) for nonoperative care.

Results: A total of 832 highly active patients with subacute anterior cruciate ligament tears were seen over the 10-year period; 315 had concomitant injuries, 87 had unresolved impairments, and 85 did not participate in the classification algorithm. The remaining 345 patients (216 men, 129 women) participated in the screening examination a mean of 6 weeks after the index injury. There were 199 subjects classified as noncopers and 146 as potential copers. Sixty-three of 88 potential copers successfully returned to preinjury activities without surgery, with 25 of these patients not undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at the time of follow-up.

Conclusion: The classification algorithm is an effective tool for prospectively identifying individuals early after anterior cruciate ligament injury who want to pursue nonoperative care or must delay surgical intervention and have good potential to do so.



NAVIGATION


         

 

Background: Despite improved biomechanical stability and kinematics with anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, concerns regarding notch impingement of the graft have persisted, particularly with increasingly anterior tibial tunnel position. The potentially mitigating effect of anatomic femoral socket position, however, has not been evaluated.

Hypothesis: Placement of the femoral socket in the central or posterolateral bundle footprint reduces the risk and magnitude of graft impingement after ACL reconstruction compared with placement in the anteromedial bundle footprint.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: This study employed computer-assisted navigation in a cadaveric model to evaluate the effect of tibial and femoral tunnel position on ACL graft impingement. Sixteen cadaveric knees were tested using the Praxim ACL Surgetics Navigation System, with the tibial tunnel positioned in the footprint of the anteromedial bundle and the femoral socket placed in the (1) anteromedial bundle footprint, (2) center of footprint, or (3) posterolateral bundle footprint. The amount of maximum impingement, angle of initial impingement, and location of graft impingement were documented through a full arc of knee motion.

Results: Impingement occurred with all 3 femoral socket positions, but the mean angle of impingement with the anteromedial femoral position (42.8° ± 26.4°) was significantly greater (P < .003) than the mean angles of impingement with the central femoral position (19.4° ± 19.2°) and the posterolateral bundle femoral position (16.7° ± 13.3°).

Conclusion: Although notch impingement was seen in all femoral socket locations with an anteromedial tibial socket position, femoral socket position in a central or posterolateral bundle location may reduce the risk and magnitude of graft impingement after ACL reconstruction. Additional studies are necessary to determine the influence of these different constructs on graft isometry and knee kinematics.

Clinical Relevance: Anatomic femoral socket position in the center of the native ACL footprint may reduce the risk and magnitude of notch impingement compared with an anteromedial bundle position with ACL reconstruction.




May 2012
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Apr    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031