Background: Quantification of the overall anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundle centers in respect to arthroscopically pertinent bony and soft tissue landmarks has not been thoroughly assessed.
Hypothesis: A standardized anatomical measurement method can quantitate the locations of the ACL and AM and PL bundle centers in reference to each other and anatomical landmarks.
Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study.
Methods: Quantification of the ACL and its bundle attachments was performed on 11 cadaveric knees using a radio frequency-tracking device.
Results: The tibial ACL attachment center was 7.5 mm medial to the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus, 13.0 mm anterior to the retro-eminence ridge, and 10.5 mm posterior to the ACL ridge. The femoral ACL attachment center was 1.7 mm proximal to the bifurcate ridge and 6.1 mm posterior to the lateral intercondylar ridge. The tibial AM attachment center was 8.3 mm medial to the anteromedial aspect of the lateral meniscus anterior horn, 17.8 mm anterior to the retro-eminence ridge, and 5.6 mm posterior to the ACL ridge. The femoral AM attachment center was 4.8 mm proximal to the bifurcate ridge and 7.1 mm posterior to the lateral intercondylar ridge. The tibial PL bundle attachment center was 6.6 mm medial to the posteromedial aspect of the lateral meniscus anterior horn, 10.8 mm anteromedial to the root attachment of the lateral meniscus posterior horn, and 8.4 mm anterior to the retro-eminence ridge. The femoral PL bundle attachment center was 5.2 mm distal to the bifurcate ridge and 3.6 mm posterior to the lateral intercondylar ridge.
Conclusion: The authors developed a comprehensive compilation of measurements of arthroscopically pertinent bony and soft tissue landmarks that quantitate the ACL and its individual bundle attachment centers on the tibia and femur.
Clinical Relevance: These clinically relevant arthroscopic landmarks may enhance single- and double-bundle ACL reconstructions through improved tunnel placement.
Background: The interest in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions has recently reawakened.
Hypothesis: The center of the femoral posterolateral (PL) bundle and the center of the femoral anteromedial (AM) bundle are not within the same plane and change their orientation throughout passive knee flexion. Additionally, the tibial center of the AM bundle is aligned with the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus and the center of the PL bundle lies at the recommended tibial tunnel position for single-bundle ACL reconstruction reconstruction, 7 to 9 mm anterior to the posterior cruciate ligament.
Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study.
Materials: In 20 human cadaveric knees (age range, 45–87 years) the distances from the center of the AM and PL bundle to the articular cartilage were measured. Radiographic analyses were performed using the techniques of Bernard and Hertel at the femur as well as the method by Stäubli and Rauschning at the tibia.
Results: The center of the AM bundle was at a point 5.3 mm ( ± 0.7) from the roof of the notch and 5.7 mm ( ± 0.5) from the intercondylar line. The center of the PL bundle is located at 6.5 mm from the shallow cartilage margin and 5.8 mm from the inferior cartilage margin. On the tibia, the center of the AM bundle is aligned with the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus, while the center of the PL bundle was located 11.2 mm ( ± 1.2) posterior and 4.1 mm ( ± 0.6) medial to the anterior insertion of the lateral meniscus. Radiographically, the center of the PL bundle is anterior along Blumensaat’s line and lower in the femoral notch along the height of the condyles than the center of the AM bundle. At the tibia, the center of the AM bundle is at 30% and the PL bundle is located at 44% using the method of Stäubli and Rauschning.
Conclusion: The center of the femoral PL bundle is shallow and inferior to the AM bundle. On the tibia, the AM bundle lies anterior when compared with the typical single-bundle ACL tunnel that reflects the PL bundle.
Clinical Relevance: To imitate the anatomy of the intact ACL, it is mandatory to place the tunnels exactly within the femoral origin and tibial insertion of the ACL.
Background: A more horizontal femoral tunnel has been emphasized for contemporary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, lowering the femoral tunnel may result in a shorter tunnel. In addition, a more horizontally placed femoral tunnel may have inadequate bone stock at the posterior portion of the tunnel, which can lead to protrusion of the cross-pin (Rigidfix) system for femoral fixation.
Hypothesis: A more horizontal femoral tunnel position, particularly via the anteromedial (AM) portal technique, will reduce femoral tunnel length, and a more horizontal femoral tunnel position and anterior-to-posterior pin insertion will increase the risk of Rigidfix pin protrusion.
Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.
Methods: In 10 cadaveric knees, we measured maximum lengths of the femoral tunnels at the positions of 11:30, 10:30, and 9:30 o’clock using the transtibial technique and at the 10:30 and 9:30 o’clock using the AM portal technique. Then, for each femoral tunnel via the transtibial technique at 11:30, 10:30, and 9:30 o’clock positions, tests were performed for 3 directions of Rigidfix pin insertion using the lateral epicondyle as an anatomical landmark, namely, 15° anterior to posterior (A-P), neutral, and 15° posterior to anterior (P-A). It was then determined whether pins protruded from the posterior cortex.
Results: The lengths of femoral tunnels produced using the transtibial technique became shorter as the femoral starting position became more horizontal (51.1 mm, 40.0 mm, and 34.2 mm on average at the 11:30, 10:30, and 9:30 o’clock position, respectively). Tunnels made using the AM portal technique were significantly shorter than those made using the transtibial technique: by 7.6 mm at the 10:30 o’clock and 4.5 mm at the 9:30 o’clock positions on average (P < .001). In addition, increasing obliquity increased the likelihood of Rigidfix pin protrusion, especially when pins were inserted in the A-P direction.
Conclusion: The current effort to lower the femoral tunnel position in ACL reconstruction can shorten the tunnel length and compromise the graft fixation at the femur using the Rigidfix system.
Clinical Relevance: When an intended femoral tunnel position is more horizontal than the 10:30 o’clock position for ACL reconstruction, a surgeon needs to be cautious regarding a short femoral tunnel, particularly when using the AM portal technique, and possible protrusion of the cross-pin (Rigidfix) fixator.
