Background: There has been growing interest in anatomical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), including the use of double-bundle (DB) reconstruction techniques.
Hypothesis: The DB technique will not be cost-effective when compared with single-bundle (SB) reconstruction.
Study Design: Economic and decision analysis; Level of evidence, 1.
Methods: A decision-analysis model with input values derived from the literature was used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of DB ACL reconstruction compared with SB ACL reconstruction. Effectiveness was based on the revision rate and the postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score.
Results: Sixty-four percent of DB knees result in an IKDC score of A, compared with 54% of SB knees. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of a DB reconstruction compared with an SB reconstruction was $6416 per quality adjusted life year in the baseline scenario and $64 371 per quality adjusted life year in the alternate scenario. The model is very sensitive to the proportions of IKDC A outcomes. The model is also sensitive to the utility values assigned to IKDC A and B outcomes and is less sensitive to the marginal cost of a DB reconstruction.
Conclusion: This preliminary analysis based on published clinical results to date shows DB ACL reconstruction may be cost-effective, despite increased upfront cost. More research is needed to confirm whether there is any difference in the distribution of IKDC outcomes between the 2 techniques. Perhaps more importantly, the lack of any other demonstrated clinical benefit from the DB technique questions the clinical relevance of this difference in IKDC scores.
Clinical Relevance: Revision data and longer term outcomes after DB reconstruction and more reliable clinical utility data are needed to definitively compare the cost-effectiveness of DB and SB ACL reconstruction. Studies of ACL reconstruction and other sports medicine procedures should report the distribution of outcomes data to facilitate future analyses of clinical effectiveness.
Background: Many studies have reported successful outcomes 10 to 15 years after ACL reconstruction. However, few authors report results at ultra long-term follow-up (more than 20 years of follow-up).
Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine how the status of the medial meniscus and the medial compartment articular cartilage observed at the time of ACL reconstruction affects results more than 24 years after surgery. This article examines long-term outcome of ACL reconstruction with extra-articular augmentation (procedure performed through a medial arthrotomy).
Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: One hundred of 148 patients reviewed at 11.5 years of follow-up could be reviewed at 24.5 years. Complete clinical and radiographic evaluation (International Knee Documentation Committee scale and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) was performed.
Results: The radiographic International Knee Documentation Committee rating was as follows: grade A, 39%; grade B, 7%; grade C, 27%; and grade D, 27%. Onset of osteoarthritis was correlated with medial meniscal status and femoral chondral defects at time of surgery.
Conclusion: Total medial meniscectomy and articular cartilage damage were risk factors for osteoarthritis.
Background: Randomized controlled trials after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with long-term follow-up including assessment of health-related quality of life are rare.
Purpose: To compare clinical outcome and health-related quality of life 8 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 2 types of graft.
Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.
Methods: Long-term follow-up of 164 patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury randomized to arthroscopic reconstruction with a quadrupled semitendinosus graft or a bone–patellar tendon–bone graft was undertaken. After a mean 8 years, 153 patients were available for follow-up, including instrumented laxity, 1-legged hop test, a knee-walking test, and assessment with International Knee Documentation Committee, Lysholm, Tegner, and patellofemoral pain score. Health-related quality of life was assessed with Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Short Form–36.
Results: Patients in both graft groups retained the same stability, knee function, and health-related quality of life. The patellofemoral pain score was similar for both groups; the bone–patellar tendon–bone group had more donor site morbidity from kneeling and knee walking. In the bone–patellar tendon–bone group, 19 patients had no kneeling problems, 23 slight problems, 31 moderate problems, and 5 unable to kneel. Corresponding figures for the semitendinosus group were 25, 32, 16, and 2 (P < .001). Patients with early reconstructions (<5 months) had a lower risk for meniscal injuries (37%) than did later reconstructed (62%, P = .008). Health-related quality of life regarding physical functioning in Short Form–36 was better for the early-reconstructed patients than for the later reconstructed (92 vs 85; P = .014). Patients without medial meniscal surgery had higher Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores for all subscales than did patients with medial meniscal surgery, with most significant difference for sport and recreation (63 vs 75, P = .008).
Conclusion: In the long term, the semitendinosus graft provided similar stability, knee function, and health-related quality of life but with less kneeling morbidity than did the bone–patellar tendon–bone graft.
Background: Impaired postoperative range of motion remains one of the most frequent complications after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Purpose: This study was undertaken to determine the preoperative factors associated with prolonged range of motion deficit after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: Between January 2007 and March 2008, a consecutive series of 217 patients underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and were reviewed at 6 weeks and 3 months after surgery. In this series, all data of patients who required a further surgery for arthrolysis until December 2009 were studied. Goniometric range of motion measurement was performed the day before surgery and at 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively. Bone contusions were analyzed on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). All MRI scans were performed in the 6 months before surgery. Seven potential risk factors—age, sex, limited preoperative range of motion, meniscal lesions, bone contusion(s), operative delay less than 45 days, and rehabilitation—were assessed using univariate analysis. The correlations between the significant factors previously identified were analyzed further using multivariate logistic regression analysis.
Results: Limited preoperative range of motion (P < .001), typical bone contusions of the lateral compartment (P < .001), operative delay less than 45 days (P = .003), and female sex (P = .049) were found to be significantly correlated with delayed recovery. The limited preoperative mobility and the presence of typical contusions were strongly correlated (P < .001). In the group of patients who underwent surgery within 45 days, delayed recovery was strongly correlated with limited preoperative mobility (P = .0008) and to the presence of typical contusions (P < .001). Arthrolysis was correlated with delayed range of motion (odds ratio [OR], 8.2; 95% confidence intervaI [CI], 1.9-50; P =.001) and bone bruise (OR, 7.6; 95% CI, 1.7-46.1; P = .002).
Conclusion: Preoperative limited range of motion and typical bone bruises of the lateral femoral condyle and tibial plateau are major risk factors for a difficult rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
