Globalepolicy.org is a free to access global medical news service for the consumer, professional and researcher.
Our adviser: Drugs Infromation online


             
 

Background: A treatment algorithm and screening examination have been developed to guide patient management and prospectively determine potential for highly active individuals to succeed with nonoperative care after anterior cruciate ligament rupture.

Objective: To prospectively characterize and classify the entire population of highly active individuals over a 10-year period and provide final outcomes for individuals who elected nonoperative care.

Methods: Inclusion criteria included presentation within 7 months of the index injury and an International Knee Documentation Committee level I or II activity level before injury. Concomitant injury, unresolved impairments, and a screening examination were used as criteria to guide management and classify individuals as noncopers (poor potential) or potential copers (good potential) for nonoperative care.

Results: A total of 832 highly active patients with subacute anterior cruciate ligament tears were seen over the 10-year period; 315 had concomitant injuries, 87 had unresolved impairments, and 85 did not participate in the classification algorithm. The remaining 345 patients (216 men, 129 women) participated in the screening examination a mean of 6 weeks after the index injury. There were 199 subjects classified as noncopers and 146 as potential copers. Sixty-three of 88 potential copers successfully returned to preinjury activities without surgery, with 25 of these patients not undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at the time of follow-up.

Conclusion: The classification algorithm is an effective tool for prospectively identifying individuals early after anterior cruciate ligament injury who want to pursue nonoperative care or must delay surgical intervention and have good potential to do so.



NAVIGATION


         

 

Background: Currently there are no prospective data available that compare the different tenodesis techniques of the long head of the biceps tendon with regard to their clinical and structural results.

Hypothesis: Soft tissue tenodesis provides clinical and structural results equivalent to those of bony fixation anchor tenodesis.

Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: Fifty-seven patients with arthroscopically proven lesions of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHB) were prospectively included in this study. Thirty patients (7 women, 23 men; mean age, 57.9 years) were treated with an arthroscopic soft tissue tenodesis (STT) and 27 patients (8 women, 19 men; mean age, 61 years) with an arthroscopic bony fixation anchor tenodesis (BFAT). The clinical evaluation included the Constant score as well as a newly developed LHB score (maximum 100 points) that includes evaluation of pain and cramps (maximum 50 points), the patient- and examiner-dependent grading of the cosmetic result (maximum 30 points), and the measurement of elbow flexion strength (maximum 20 points). The integrity of the tenodesis construct was evaluated indirectly by detecting the position of the LHB using magnetic resonance imaging. A proximal intertubercular location of the tendon was judged as an intact tenodesis construct (3 points), a distal intertubercular location as a failure of tenodesis followed by autotenodesis in the sulcus (2 points), and an extratubercular location as a complete failure (1 point).

Results: Twenty-four patients (5 women, 19 men; mean age, 58.6 years; mean follow-up, 19.6 months) in the STT group and 20 patients (5 women, 15 men; mean age, 59.1 years; mean follow-up, 22.4 months) in the BFAT group could be evaluated. The overall Constant score did not reveal any significant difference in the STT group (mean, 75.0 points) compared with the BFAT group (mean, 78.3 points) (P > .05). However, the BFAT group showed significantly better results in the LHB score (BFAT mean, 91.8 points vs STT mean, 80.9 points), the examiner-dependent evaluation of the cosmetic result (BFAT mean, 11.3 points vs STT mean, 8.0 points), as well as in the evaluation of the structural integrity of the tenodesis construct (BFAT mean, 2.7 points vs STT mean, 2.2 points) (P < .05).

Conclusion: When arthroscopic tenodesis of the LHB is indicated, the authors recommend a bony fixation over soft tissue fixation because anchor fixation provides significant advantages concerning the clinical and structural outcome.




May 2012
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Apr    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031