Globalepolicy.org is a free to access global medical news service for the consumer, professional and researcher.
Our adviser: Drugs Infromation online


             
 

Background: A treatment algorithm and screening examination have been developed to guide patient management and prospectively determine potential for highly active individuals to succeed with nonoperative care after anterior cruciate ligament rupture.

Objective: To prospectively characterize and classify the entire population of highly active individuals over a 10-year period and provide final outcomes for individuals who elected nonoperative care.

Methods: Inclusion criteria included presentation within 7 months of the index injury and an International Knee Documentation Committee level I or II activity level before injury. Concomitant injury, unresolved impairments, and a screening examination were used as criteria to guide management and classify individuals as noncopers (poor potential) or potential copers (good potential) for nonoperative care.

Results: A total of 832 highly active patients with subacute anterior cruciate ligament tears were seen over the 10-year period; 315 had concomitant injuries, 87 had unresolved impairments, and 85 did not participate in the classification algorithm. The remaining 345 patients (216 men, 129 women) participated in the screening examination a mean of 6 weeks after the index injury. There were 199 subjects classified as noncopers and 146 as potential copers. Sixty-three of 88 potential copers successfully returned to preinjury activities without surgery, with 25 of these patients not undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at the time of follow-up.

Conclusion: The classification algorithm is an effective tool for prospectively identifying individuals early after anterior cruciate ligament injury who want to pursue nonoperative care or must delay surgical intervention and have good potential to do so.



NAVIGATION


         

 

Background:

The anterior intermeniscal ligament of the knee is at risk during knee arthroscopy, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and tibial nail insertion.


Hypothesis:

Release of the anterior intermeniscal ligament, in knees with type I ligaments, will result in altered contact pressures in the medial compartment.


Study Design:

Controlled laboratory study.


Methods:

Five fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees with intact type I anterior intermeniscal ligaments were chosen for testing in a modified MTS machine from 0° to 60° of flexion under 2 conditions: (1) intact and (2) after sharp sectioning of the anterior intermeniscal ligament. Measurements were made using inframeniscal contact pressure sensors covering the medial compartment. Poststudy analysis was done in 10° increments between 0° and 60° of flexion, looking at peak contact pressure and the amount of contact area seeing pressure.


Results:

Sectioning of the anterior intermeniscal ligament caused a statistically significant increase in the peak pressure at 20°, 30°, 40°, and 50° of knee flexion. The largest change occurred at 40° of knee flexion, when the peak pressure increased by 27.5% (3.68 MPa to 4.69 MPa). Contact area decreased, although this difference was not statistically significant.


Conclusion:

Release of the anterior intermeniscal ligament results in increased peak contact pressures in the medial compartment of the knee.


Clinical Relevance:

Care should be taken to avoid sacrifice of this ligament during surgery.

 

Knee meniscectomy is the most common procedure performed by orthopaedic surgeons. While it is generally believed that loss of meniscal tissue leads to osteoarthritis and poor knee function, many variables may significantly influence this outcome. Through literature search engines including PubMed and Ovid, 4 randomized controlled trials, 2 prospective cohorts, and 23 retrospective cohorts that fit the criteria for level I, II, and III level of evidence were included in this systematic review. For the level III evidence studies, follow-up of 5 years or more was required. Preoperative and intraoperative predictors of poor clinical or radiographic outcomes included total meniscectomy or removal of the peripheral meniscal rim, lateral meniscectomy, degenerative meniscal tears, presence of chondral damage, presence of hand osteoarthritis suggestive of genetic predisposition, and increased body mass index. Variables that were not predictive of outcome or were inconclusive or had mixed results included meniscal tear pattern, age, mechanical alignment, sex of patient, activity level, and meniscal tears associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. While an intact meniscus or meniscal repair was generally favorable in the ACL-reconstructed knees, meniscal repair of degenerative meniscal tissue was not favorable. There is a lack of uniformity in the literature on this subject with a preponderance of lower level evidence. Although randomized controlled trials are considered to be the gold standard in medical research, a multicenter prospective cohort design may be more appropriate in assessing the long-term outcome of meniscal surgery and the role that multiple preoperative and intraoperative variables may play in clinical outcomes. In addition, future studies should include factors not assessed or adequately evaluated by several of the included studies, such as meniscal tear pattern, age, mechanical alignment, sex of the patient, activity level, meniscal tears associated with other injuries such as the ACL, smoking, and the effect of previous surgery.




May 2012
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Apr    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031