Globalepolicy.org is a free to access global medical news service for the consumer, professional and researcher.


             
 

Background: A treatment algorithm and screening examination have been developed to guide patient management and prospectively determine potential for highly active individuals to succeed with nonoperative care after anterior cruciate ligament rupture.

Objective: To prospectively characterize and classify the entire population of highly active individuals over a 10-year period and provide final outcomes for individuals who elected nonoperative care.

Methods: Inclusion criteria included presentation within 7 months of the index injury and an International Knee Documentation Committee level I or II activity level before injury. Concomitant injury, unresolved impairments, and a screening examination were used as criteria to guide management and classify individuals as noncopers (poor potential) or potential copers (good potential) for nonoperative care.

Results: A total of 832 highly active patients with subacute anterior cruciate ligament tears were seen over the 10-year period; 315 had concomitant injuries, 87 had unresolved impairments, and 85 did not participate in the classification algorithm. The remaining 345 patients (216 men, 129 women) participated in the screening examination a mean of 6 weeks after the index injury. There were 199 subjects classified as noncopers and 146 as potential copers. Sixty-three of 88 potential copers successfully returned to preinjury activities without surgery, with 25 of these patients not undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at the time of follow-up.

Conclusion: The classification algorithm is an effective tool for prospectively identifying individuals early after anterior cruciate ligament injury who want to pursue nonoperative care or must delay surgical intervention and have good potential to do so.



NAVIGATION


         

 

Background: Although many posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries are in combination with posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries, there has been little research on combined injury reconstruction; the literature includes differing recommendations.

Hypothesis: Combined PCL plus PLC reconstruction corrects the abnormal posterior translation, varus, and external rotation laxities caused by combined PCL plus PLC deficiency. Furthermore, double-bundle PCL plus PLC reconstruction restores laxity closer to normal than single-bundle PCL plus PLC reconstruction.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Cadaveric knee kinematics were measured electromagnetically in 9 knees with posterior drawer, external rotation, and varus rotation loads applied at sequential stages: intact, PCL-deficient, PCL plus PLC-deficient, double-bundle PCL plus modified Larson PLC reconstruction, and single-bundle PCL plus modified Larson PLC reconstruction. Each graft was tensioned using a laxity-matching protocol.

Results: There was no significant difference between single-bundle and double-bundle PCL reconstruction, in combination with the modified Larson reconstruction, at any angle of flexion. Both combined reconstructions restored posterior drawer, external rotation, and varus laxity so that they did not differ significantly from normal.

Conclusion: In combined PCL plus PLC deficiency, combined PCL plus PLC reconstruction restored all major laxity limits to normal across the range of knee flexion examined. Double-bundle PCL reconstruction was not better than single-bundle reconstruction in this context.

Clinical Relevance: The added complexity of double-bundle reconstruction does not seem to be justified by these results. In combined PCL plus PLC-deficient knees, combined single-bundle PCL plus modified Larson PLC reconstruction was sufficient to restore posterior drawer, external rotation, and varus laxity to normal.




August 2008
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Jul    
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031