Background: One aspect of the debate over the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament is whether it should be carried out with the single-bundle or double-bundle technique.
Hypothesis: The double-bundle technique results in fewer graft failures than the single-bundle technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.
Methods: A total of 153 patients were prospectively randomized into 2 groups of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autografts using aperture interference screw fixation: single-bundle technique (SB group, n = 78) and double-bundle technique (DB group, n = 75). The evaluation methods were clinical examination, KT-1000 arthrometric measurement, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and the Lysholm knee scores, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation. All of the operations were performed by 1 experienced orthopaedic surgeon, and all clinical assessments were made by 2 blinded and independent examiners. A musculoskeletal radiologist blinded to the clinical data made the MRI interpretation.
Results: There were no differences between the study groups preoperatively. Ninety percent of patients (n = 138) were available at a minimum 2-year follow-up (range, 24-37 months). Eight patients (7 in the SB group and 1 in the DB group) had graft failure during the follow-up and had anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery (P = .04). In addition, 7 patients (5 in the SB group and 2 in the DB group) had an invisible graft on the MRI assessment at the 2-year follow-up. Also, the anteromedial bundle was partially invisible in 2 patients and the posterolateral bundle in 9 patients. Together, the total number of failures and invisible grafts were significantly higher in the SB group (12 patients, 15%) than the DB group (3 patients, 4%) (P = .024). No significant group differences were found in the knee scores or stability evaluations at the follow-up.
Conclusion: This 2-year randomized trial showed that the revision rate of the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was significantly lower with the double-bundle technique than that with the single-bundle technique. However, additional years of follow-up are needed to reveal the long-term results.
Background: Controversy persists as to whether double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) has any clinical advantage over single-bundle reconstruction. Several studies have used subjective and nonquantitative manual tests to evaluate the rotatory stability of the knee. The authors have developed a method to quantitate the rotatory stability of the ACL-deficient knee using open magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Hypothesis: Anatomic double-bundle reconstruction restores rotatory stability significantly better than does single-bundle reconstruction.
Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: Twenty-three consecutive patients treated with the single-bundle reconstruction (group S) and 25 consecutive patients treated with the anatomic double-bundle reconstruction (group D) were evaluated. Both reconstruction procedures were performed using hamstring tendon autografts. The Slocum anterolateral rotatory instability (ALRI) test was performed 1 year after surgery using open MRI. To assess rotatory stability, we measured the difference in anterior tibial translation between medial and lateral compartments in the sagittal plane and defined this difference as the ALRI value. In addition, clinical examinations consisting of the Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity score, KT-2000 arthrometer anterior translation examination, and the pivot-shift test were carried out.
Results: The mean side-to-side difference in ALRI values was significantly less (P < .001) in double-bundle reconstruction (mean, 1.2 mm) than in single-bundle reconstruction (mean, 4.1 mm). The mean side-to-side difference in KT-2000 arthrometer measurements was significantly less (P = .014) in double-bundle reconstruction (mean, 1.2 mm) than in single-bundle reconstruction (mean, 2.6 mm). The difference in the incidence of positive pivot-shift tests between group S (43%) and group D (16%) did not reach the level of statistical significance (P = .058). No significant differences in Lysholm score or Tegner score between the groups were observed.
Conclusion: The rotatory stability of anatomic double-bundle reconstruction was significantly better than the rotatory stability of single-bundle reconstruction.
Background: Injuries to the posterolateral corner of the knee remain a challenging problem and have been cited frequently as a reason for failure of anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Although several reconstructive techniques currently exist, there are relatively few clinical outcomes data after reconstruction of the posterolateral corner.
Purpose: The study was undertaken to examine the clinical outcomes and provide objective data using arthrometry and stress radiography of a posterolateral corner reconstruction technique.
Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study of a consecutive series of patients who underwent posterolateral corner reconstruction of the knee was evaluated. The surgery featured dual femoral tunnels, a transfibular tunnel, and a free graft to reconstruct the posterolateral corner of the knee. All patients had concomitant reconstruction of one or both cruciate ligaments. Outcomes were assessed using the Short Form–12, Lysholm, and Tegner knee scores. A clinical examination, KT-2000 arthrometry measurements, single-legged hop quotient, and varus and posterior Telos stress radiographs were obtained and compared with results for the contralateral, uninjured knees.
Results: Twenty-four (83%) of 29 consecutive patients were evaluated at a mean 39 months postoperatively (range, 24-81 months). The mean Lysholm and Tegner knee scores were 83 and 6, respectively. The mean difference (± standard deviation) in total anterior-posterior side-to-side KT arthrometry measurements was 1.4 ± 1.3 mm. The varus stress radiographic mean side-to-side difference measured at 20° of flexion was 0.2 ± 1.9 mm. The mean radiographic posterior tibial displacement with a 15-kg stress at 90° of flexion was 3.2 ± 4.5 mm in patients undergoing posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Conclusion: This reconstruction of the posterolateral corner of the knee with concomitant cruciate ligament reconstruction restores varus and rotational stability at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively.
